We migrated our brand. No traffic was lost.Send us some kudos

Let's get the ball rolling.

What you see in the browser isn't always what Google sees.

We compare your rendered output against what search engines actually receive, so you know exactly where the gaps are.

Our approach

  1. Render comparison: Using our proprietary Web Rendering Monitoring tool, we run a side-by-side analysis of what your site serves to users versus what search engines receive. This covers DOM output, resource loading, and content visibility across key page types and templates.
  2. Framework & architecture review: We assess how your front-end framework handles rendering and whether your current setup is creating blind spots for search engines. This includes evaluating hydration behaviour, lazy loading, JavaScript dependencies, and content injection timing.
  3. Impact analysis & fix plan: We quantify what's being lost due to rendering gaps and deliver a prioritised remediation plan. Recommendations are tailored to your stack, whether that's shifting to SSR, implementing dynamic rendering, or optimising how critical content loads.
  4. Validation & ongoing checks: After fixes are applied, we re-test rendering across affected templates using Web Rendering Monitoring to confirm search engines are now receiving the full content. Your team gets continuous monitoring so regressions are caught early, not after traffic drops.

Tell us what you're noticing

What’s the concern?
What framework are you using?
Does the site rely heavily on client-side rendering?

Tell us a bit about you